FINAL REPORT: The Future of Grants in Domestic Preparedness

According to, a federal grant is an award of financial assistance from a federal agency to a recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States. Currently, 26 federal agencies offer over 1,000 grant programs annually in 21 different fields (e.g., disaster prevention and relief, education, community development, health, arts) serving a wide range of people and communities. It is estimated that almost 100 of these grant programs are considered preparedness related and support the ability to build and improve the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from threats that pose the greatest risk to national security.

Although the federal grants-in-aid system has significantly evolved since its inception, the past decade has resulted in a significant increase in grant-related preparedness assistance from several federal agencies. During that same time frame, state and local governments have come to rely more heavily on federal financial assistance than at any previous time in the past century. However, today’s economic conditions have placed significant financial pressures on local, state, and federal budgets that have resulted in many budget reductions. Declining budgets have begun to adversely affect several of the largest preparedness grant programs and may reduce the government’s capacity to meet prior demands for service and support of preparedness capabilities throughout the country. For example, funding reductions have affected such programs as the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) and the Department of Education’s School Emergency Response and Crisis Management Plan Discretionary Grant Program.

The survey posed a series of questions to DomPrep40 Advisors (DP40) and DomPrep readers to gather opinions on how the future of federal grant funding will impact program priorities, multi-jurisdictional and multi-disciplinary collaboration efforts, and the effective administration of grants.

Key Findings

Reduced federal grant funding could have significant implications on national preparedness through themesentified in the survey responses to include:

  • Stakeholders may be less likely to use multi-disciplinary approaches;
  • Stakeholders may be less likely to accept federal assistance unless the requirements are reduced;
  • Stakeholders may be less likely to conduct training and exercises;
  • Stakeholders would reduce personnel and administrative costs, which may lead to less efficient programs.

Click for Full Report

Marko Bourne

Marko Bourne is a principal at Booz Allen Hamilton and a DomPrep40 advisor. He is leader of both the company’s FEMA market team and its Emergency Management and Response practice, and has more than 27 years of experience in: emergency services; emergency management; policy, governmental, and legislative affairs; and public affairs. Before joining Booz Allen Hamilton he was FEMA’s director of policy and program analysis (2006-2009) – and, earlier, director of business development for homeland security (2004-2006) at Earth Tech Inc./Tyco International. He also served as acting director of the DHS National Incident Management System Integration Center and as deputy director of FEMA’s Preparedness Division (2003-2004).



No tags to display


Translate »